Essay --

There is evidence that people from Asian were the first to cross over to sum America via the land bridge.This hypothesis can be looked at in many different slipway. Since the technology would score not been advanced, Asians would not have been able to easily navigate the vast ocean. This would force most of the population to travel by foot. These people would have left geological markers wherever they went. pottery would be an important clue to what type of people discovered North America. Looking at how advanced the pottery is by looking at shape, texture, and effectiveness would determine how advanced a civilization was. Comparing pottery from around the same time the land bridge occurred to pottery found in North America could determine if they had come from the same place. The technique and the style of the pottery would be a close resemblance of the pottery in Asia. Finding biological evidence would be more difficult since lineage cannot be traced that far back. Looking at similarities in the Native American tribes and the people in past Asian might provide some, but not fully viable information on biological evidence.The first Americans possibly being big bet on hunters who migrated according to herds of animals could be answered with the concept of seasonal collapse. One would have to search for factors that affected those first Americans positively, and then examine the possibility of eliminating one of those factors, impairing these first Americans, cause them to pursue migrating herds in hope of finding another stable living environment. An additional interpretation regarding the migration of the first Americans was that they may have benefited in unexpected ways from this migration. The migration of animal herds took the... ... conclude that the shroud is not actually a biblical relic. Another way to verify the shroud would be to look at the cultivation of the people and their records. If the shroud has nothing to do with the burial ritual there is no way it could be connected to the crucifixion of Christ. Carbon dating would in any case be helpful in this situation. If the shroud dated back to biblical times, then there would be no way that it could be a fake. It would no doubt be a shroud that covered a crucified body although it would be harder to conclude that the body was actually the one of Jesus. Looking at records would be the next step. It would have to be concluded that the crucifixion of Jesus was the only Roman crucifixion that shoved a crown of thorns onto a mans head. If this were true, the evidence would be abounding. There would be very little evidence to disclaim this as truth.